When using the sort by Width (Pixels) & Name, I assume that it would first sort by the pixel width and, if 2+ images have the same width then they would be sorted by their file name.
Unfortunately it doesn't appear to consistently do this? I occasionally will get an image one pixel in size different in the midst of several identical width images. And for the same width images, the file names don't seem to sort alphabetically.
I have the same problem with sort by Height (Pixels) & Name.
Am I not understanding how this sort is supposed to work?
If it is working correctly, then is there a way to sort by the actual pixel width and then subsort by the image file name?
Thanks!
Sort by Width (Pixels) & Name problem
- forum_adm
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1963
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 9:41 am
- Location: Germany
- Country: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Sort by Width (Pixels) & Name problem
The sorting uses the pixel width first.
Please enable the display of the pixel size and email a screenshot to support@lemkesoft.de
Please enable the display of the pixel size and email a screenshot to support@lemkesoft.de